App Store rejection
Guideline 4.2 - Design - Minimum Functionality
Apple thinks your app doesn't do enough beyond a website, or isn't useful enough on its own. We find what's missing, add what makes it an app and stay on it until it's approved. Fixed price, half paid only after approval.
Free triage within 12 business hours.
Paste the rejection, get a straight answer
Free first read. We reply within 12 business hours with what's behind it and a fixed price.
What the message is about
Guideline 4.2 says your app should include features, content and UI that take it beyond a repackaged website. If it isn't particularly useful, unique or "app-like", Apple says it doesn't belong on the App Store.
The parts that come up most:
- The app is mostly a website shown inside the app.
- The app is mainly marketing material, a collection of links or content pulled from elsewhere.
- The app doesn't work on its own without another app.
- The app was made with a commercial template or app generation service (4.2.6).
Read guideline 4.2 on Apple's site →
What Apple's message says
4.2 rejections point to the guideline itself. Its key lines, word for word, and what they mean in practice.
Your app should include features, content, and UI that elevate it beyond a repackaged website.
If the reviewer opens your app and sees your website, Apple treats it as a website. What counts is what the app does that the site can't: native screens, device features, things that work offline.
If your app is not particularly useful, unique, or “app-like,” it doesn’t belong on the App Store.
This part is about apps that do too little, even without a website inside. A single screen or a list of links needs a reason to be installed.
What it actually means
The reviewer opened your app and saw something that looks like your website, or like a single screen, without a reason to install it.
This hits apps built with WebView, Capacitor and AI app builders most often. It's not about the tools. It's about what the reviewer sees in the first minute: native navigation, features that use the device, and something the website can't do.
Why guessing is expensive
- New icons or a splash screen don't change what the reviewer sees inside, so the same answer comes back.
- Adding random native features takes time and still might not convince the reviewer, if they don't change how the app feels.
- Arguing that "it's more than a website" without showing it rarely works.
- Every round is another week, and a full rebuild done in a hurry costs far more than it should.
What we do
- Look at your app the way the reviewer did and find what makes it feel like a website or an unfinished app.
- Pick the smallest set of changes that make the difference visible: native navigation, device features, offline use, things the website can't do.
- Build them, prepare the new build and write review notes that walk the reviewer to them.
- Write the reply to App Review and stay on it through every round.
You keep your code and your account. We never ask for your Apple ID password. If we need access, it goes through an App Store Connect user with the App Manager role.
Fixed price
Reviewer Reply
$99
Regular price: $190When the app already does enough and the reviewer missed it: review notes, a screen recording plan and your reply to App Review, followed until Apple decides. No code changes.
Rejection Fix
$249
Regular price: from $490The changes that make your app clearly more than a website, the new build, the reply to App Review and every round for the same issue.
App far from review-ready, or needs a bigger rework? That's Launch Rescue, from $2,100, scoped after the triage.
Several apps rejected at once? Send them all, we'll quote per app.
50% to start, 50% after Apple approves the submission. If Apple does not approve the submission for the guidelines we fixed, we keep working on those guidelines at no extra cost for up to 3 resubmissions within 60 days. If it still is not approved, you do not pay the second half. If your app is built on a commercial template or app generation service under 4.2.6, we'll tell you upfront that the guarantee doesn't cover it.
Proof
4.3(a) Design Spam · App concept review
So I was facing this issue where one of my app got design spam twice. And seeing other on X also getting it more frequently now I got real demotivated and there was this fear in me that my next app will probably get design spam too because already there are other similar apps. In my case I was not having an issue with binary or metadata as I create things from ground up the main issue was app concept.
After talking to team I got to know that we can do consultation call with apple review team even before submitting build. The team also emphasized that first screenshot should highlights your unique features that no one have.
Going forward I will now try consultation calls with the apple team and also will highlight my unique features instead of the most popular and famous one.
An app we worked on went through 7 rejections and was approved on round 8.
Questions
What does "elevate it beyond a repackaged website" mean?
Apple wants the app to do things your website can't: native navigation, features that use the device, content that works offline. If the app mostly shows your site, it's treated as a repackaged website, whatever it was built with.
My app is built with Capacitor or a WebView. Is that the problem?
Not by itself. The problem is when the result looks and works like your website. Many apps built this way are approved.
Do I have to rebuild the app natively?
Usually not. Most of the time a few changes in the right places are enough.
My app is simple on purpose. Can it still pass?
Yes, if it's useful on its own and does something a website can't. Simple isn't the same as minimal.
I used an AI app builder. Is that 4.2.6?
4.2.6 is about commercial templates and app generation services. Whether it applies depends on how your app was made, and that's one of the first things we check.
How fast do you answer?
Free triage within 12 business hours.
Do you need my Apple ID password?
No, never. Access goes through an App Store Connect user with the App Manager role.
Send us your rejection
Paste Apple's message and tell us what your app is built with (native, Capacitor, WebView, React Native, Flutter, an AI builder). We'll tell you what's missing and give you a fixed price.
Prefer X? DM us at @verdict_studio
Got it. Free triage within 12 business hours.
Written by Ivan Bilousov, founder of Verdict Studio · Updated